Hello.
On 07/31/2013 09:42 PM, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Device tree entries for the three EHCI controllers on Tegra114.
Enables the the third controller (USB host) on Dalmore.
I would have done the board patch separately from the SoC one.
Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
index abf6c40..2905145 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114.dtsi
@@ -430,6 +430,68 @@
status = "disable";
};
+ usb@7d000000 {
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-ehci", "usb-ehci";
+ reg = <0x7d000000 0x4000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 20 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ phy_type = "utmi";
+ clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_USBD>;
+ nvidia,phy = <&phy1>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ phy1: usb-phy@7d000000 {
At the same address as the previous node?
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-usb-phy";
+ reg = <0x7d000000 0x4000 0x7d000000 0x4000>;
Hm, there must be some mistake: two similar register ranges.
+ usb@7d008000 {
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-ehci", "usb-ehci";
+ reg = <0x7d008000 0x4000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 97 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ phy_type = "utmi";
+ clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_USB3>;
+ nvidia,phy = <&phy3>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ phy3: usb-phy@7d008000 {
Again at the same address as previous node?
+ compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-usb-phy";
+ reg = <0x7d008000 0x4000 0x7d000000 0x4000>;
Second range conflicts with previous nodes.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
