On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:29:32AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Yeah, sure, thank you very much for your input. It is of course > strictly ordered and the documentation needs to be updated. While I note the way you're saying this given the widespread adoption I think there's a bit more effort needed on making sure people are aware of this model and that it's possible to do it - most of the APIs with devres support really ought to have things like a devm_clk_get_enable() (an example discussed further up the thread) added to them. devres has been quite widely adopted but not in a way that supports this usage model.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
