On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Martin van Es wrote: > > Maybe that's the explanation: The scanner isn't able to cope when the > packets arrive too rapidly. It _is_ clear from the usbmon data that > the scanner is at least slightly buggy. So the scanner might be incompatible with USB3 and maybe a USB2 hub could alleviate these problems? I know you can't give any guarantees, but is the idea plausible? Isn't USB3 supposed to "scale back" when confronted with USB2 devices? Regards, Martin -- If 'but' was any useful, it would be a logic operator -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
