On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:27:20PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/18/2013 11:49 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:16:35PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > >> I have already used this API for our MIPI CSI-2/DSIM DPHYs driver, > >> the RFC patch series can be found at [1]. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sylwester > >> > >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg251666.html > > > > one comment to that series: > > > > let's make the phy names standardized, how about phy-exynos-video-mipi.c > > or phy-mipi-csi-dsim.c ? > > Yes, I have been thinking about that, wasn't sure exactly what pattern to > chose. I would make it phy-exynos-mipi-video.c, phy-exynos-dsim-csis.c feels > a bit odd. phy-mipi-csis-dsim.c might be to generic as MIPI CSIS stands for > MIPI CSI Slave and MIPI DSIM - MIPI DSI Master. And there might be (actually > are) IP blocks in an SoC that use the other MIPI Aliance standards. > For the HDMI PHY I guess just phy-exynos-hdmi.c could be used. sounds good to me :-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
