Re: [PATCH V3 08/11] USB: OHCI: Properly handle ohci-platform suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19-06-2013 16:12, Manjunath Goudar wrote:

Suspend scenario in case of ohci-platform glue was not
properly handled as it was not suspending generic part
of ohci controller. Calling explicitly the ohci_suspend()
routine in ohci_platform_suspend() will ensure proper
handling of suspend scenario.

Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar <manjunath.goudar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

V2:
  -Incase ohci_suspend() fails, return right away without
   executing further.

V3:
  -Aligned variable "do_wakeup" and "ret".
---
  drivers/usb/host/ohci-platform.c |    9 ++++++++-
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-platform.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-platform.c
index bc30475..f4830a5 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-platform.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-platform.c
@@ -139,14 +139,21 @@ static int ohci_platform_remove(struct platform_device *dev)

  static int ohci_platform_suspend(struct device *dev)
  {
+	struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
  	struct usb_ohci_pdata *pdata = dev->platform_data;
  	struct platform_device *pdev =
  		container_of(dev, struct platform_device, dev);

Again, the above variables weren't aligned. I bet you were just cut-and-pasting the same code without looking... :-/

+	bool		do_wakeup = device_may_wakeup(dev);
+	int		ret;

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux