On Sunday 09 June 2013 23:18:28 Ming Lei wrote: > 2), the biggest change is the situation in which usb_submit_urb() is called > in complete() callback, so the introduced tasklet schedule delay might be a > con, but it shouldn't be a big deal: > > - control/bulk asynchronous transfer isn't sensitive to schedule > delay That is debatable.Missing a frame boundary is expensive because the increased latency then translates into lower throughput. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
