Re: Starting frames for isochronous URBs in xhci-hcd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:01:32PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Sarah:
> 
> xhci_queue_isoc_tx_prepare() has a comment saying "Always assume 
> URB_ISO_ASAP set".  I'd like to see about fixing this, but I don't know 
> where to look.  It doesn't seem as though any significant computations 
> are done for the starting frame; the value always gets set to the 
> current (micro)frame number.  In particular, the driver doesn't use 
> HCS_IST.
> 
> Does the hardware expose the scheduling information for isochronous 
> endpoints?  I couldn't find any mention of this in the xHCI spec.

That's a big can of worms.  I have a larger plan to fix some isochronous
ring performance issues, and I'd like to implement this change along
with that.

Can you wait for that change to go in?  AFAIK no in-kernel drivers don't
set URB_ISO_ASAP, so I didn't think this was an urgent change.

Sarah Sharp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux