On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 04/06/2013 12:56 AM, Alan Stern wrote: > > >>>> And instead of passing hcd->regs, wouldn't it be better to pass hcd? > >>> I really don't know. > >>> > >>>> Other users of this interface might need to initialize something other > >>>> than a non-standard register. > >>> Hm, maybe... if passing 'struct usb_hcd *' would indeed help here. > >>> Do you think it's > >>> worth passing 'struct platform_device *' along with it? > >> Probably not as it can be extracted from 'hcd->self.controller'... > > It's up to you. Generally I think it's easier to pass an extra > > argument than to force the function being called to dig it out. > > Note that in our use case we don't even need this argument. Okay, then don't pass it. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
