Op 3 apr. 2013, om 15:09 heeft Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> het volgende geschreven: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: >> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: >> >>>> Felipe, could you explain the background on how the dsps driver is >>>> supposed to work in host mode at boot time with the rework of the driver >>>> you did for 3.7? It might just be me not understanding the rationale >>>> behind all these changes, but appearantly, I'm not the only one who's >>>> affected by that. >>> >>> right, so the idea with that was to drop the huge amount of ifdeferry >>> hack from the MUSB driver. It would be great if someone would send >>> *CLEAN* patches adding Kconfig-based role choices again. >> >> Are Kconfig-based rules really what we want here after all? Wouldn't >> run-time configured settings make much more sense, considering that > > we need both. Say that you want to build a product with MUSB hardwired > as host, why would you enable gadget framework ? > > I can think of at least am335x where this would be perfectly plausible > (no EHCI available, only MUSB). Nice that you mention am335x, since the beaglebone has 2 MUSB controllers: one hardwired as host and one hardwired as slave. So how will KConfig options solve that?-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
