On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:16:03PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:12:27PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > > > > I think it is more acceptable to provide a small but more-or-less > > > > > complete solution and I intend to do further works in a manner > > > > > demonstrated in the above mentioned thread. > > > > > > > > alright, but do we still have the old modprobe-based API even with your > > > > patchset ? > > > > > > Yes, we do. As I mention in the cover letter > > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg83460.html: > > > > > > > > > "Please note that the old g_serial.ko is still available and works." > > > > > > It is not any kind of an adapter. It is just the "good-old" g_serial.ko > > > as it used to be. > > > > alright, cool. > > > > Can you put complete series in a branch ? I'll leave it in my testing > > branch for v3.11 so we don't miss any merge windows anymore. > > just found it. You had a typo in your cover letter which prevented me > from pulling it, actually the typo is the branch name. It's called > usb-gadgdet-configf instead of usb-gadget-configfs. > > I'll leave it in testing and hurry on testing it, if nothing is broken, > I guess I can squeeze it in my 'next' branch since this has been pending > for far too long. Sebastian's email address was also broken, I fixed it all up now. Will run a few tests. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
