Hi, On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:33:56AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/02/2013 02:36 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:19:51AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 03/21/2013 06:23 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> PHY layer no longer returns NULL, we must switch from > >>> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to IS_ERR(). > >> > >> The patches that I'll put into my topic branch are not yet > >> complete; Venu first posted them a couple days back and there are > >> a number of issues that will require a repost. > > > > is your topic branch ready now ? I'm about to close my tree for > > v3.10, we already have -rc5 tagged and I want to leave my pull > > request cooking in next for a while. > > Unfortunately not. > > Venu's patch series had a bunch of runtime bugs, and I also found out > that the DT binding /still/ wasn't fully thought out. As such, this > series won't be applied for 3.10. > > I still have a vague (and probably naive) hope that the updated > bindings and DT file modifications can be applied on the Tegra side in > the next few days so that for 3.11 there won't be any inter-tree > dependencies. However, we'll just have to wait and see whether Venu > has found the bugs yet. alright, so I'll go ahead and close my 'next' branch for v3.10, tomorrow. Leave it in linux-next for a few days and send my pull request to Greg by Friday. Let me just check if there are any other important features to go in v3.10 which won't cause big regressions. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
