Re: Multiple usb_storage problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 30 Mar 2013, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have a Corsair Flash Voyager GT and a Lenovo x220 running Fedora's
> > 3.8.2 kernel.  It doesn't work very well, and the problems vary
> > depending on whether I'm using usb2 or usb3.
> >
> >  - On usb3, the device node can't be opened with O_DIRECT (using, for
> > example, dd oflag=direct).  It returns -EINVAL.  (On usb2, O_DIRECT
> > works.)
> >  - Also on usb3, if I dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M, dd finishes
> > in a second or two and no I/O occurs.  This system only has 2GB of RAM
> > -- caching shouldn't be that extreme.
> 
> *facepalm*.  The issue is that one of the I/O errors caused the sdb
> block device to get sufficiently wedged that it still exists in /sys,
> but udev removed sdb (and I replaced it with a file).  If I manually
> recreate the sdb device node, ejecting it gets an IO error.  (It's not
> plugged in any more.)  rmmoding and modprobing usb_storage got rid of
> the bogus sdb device.

Does this mean that none of the problems mentioned in the first email 
require any attention?  What about the "sufficiently wedged" issue?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux