Re: Active URB submitted twice in pegasus driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Sarah Sharp wrote:

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:54:25PM +0200, Petko Manolov wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Sarah Sharp wrote:

But considering the multicast code is pretty old, I bet I'm running into
a different bug...

The fix is rather small.  Approximately one gigabyte was transferred
while alternating in and out of promiscuous mode.  No issues.

I guess this should move the driver out of the equation.


cheers,
Petko

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c b/drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c
index 73051d1..879da39 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/pegasus.c
@@ -1220,8 +1220,6 @@ static void pegasus_set_multicast(struct net_device *net)
 		pegasus->eth_regs[EthCtrl2] &= ~RX_PROMISCUOUS;
 	}

-	pegasus->ctrl_urb->status = 0;
-
 	pegasus->flags |= ETH_REGS_CHANGE;
 	ctrl_callback(pegasus->ctrl_urb);
 }

This patch does avoid writes to the URB, however...

static void ctrl_callback(struct urb *urb)
{
       pegasus_t *pegasus = urb->context;
       int status = urb->status;

       if (!pegasus)
               return;

       switch (status) {
       case 0:
               if (pegasus->flags & ETH_REGS_CHANGE) {
                       pegasus->flags &= ~ETH_REGS_CHANGE;
                       pegasus->flags |= ETH_REGS_CHANGED;
                       update_eth_regs_async(pegasus);
                       return;
               }
               break;

ctrl_callback is still reading the URB status, and using it in the
switch statement.  It's also using the urb->context as well, to dig out
a pointer (pegasus_t) that the pegasus_set_multicast already has access
to.  What happens if an URB to get the registers completes at the same
time pegasus_set_multicast calls ctrl_callback?  If the URB failed for
some reason (e.g. bad cable, stall), you'll miss that if statement.  I
don't think that's what you intended to do.

I think the fix should be to just to move the if block into a new
function, and call it both in ctrl_callback() and
pegasus_set_multicast().

The _real_ fix would be to rework the whole callback mechanism, but this is a different story. It is in my todo list.

Further, is it possible to call any of these functions asynchronously?
- get_registers
- set_registers
- update_eth_regs_async

[get|set]_registers() are being usded only within process context - they all call schedule(). update_eth_regs_async() is, as the name hints, asynchronous. It was introduced to handle the singular case of pegasus_set_multicast(), which may be called at any time.

What happens if the upper layer calls get_registers and
update_eth_regs_async in rapid succession?  You'll attempt to use the
control URB in both places, which will trigger the original warning I
was reporting.  Or is there some locking somewhere I'm missing?

There is. Kind of. If you look at this code, which is shared between both get and set_registers():

        add_wait_queue(&pegasus->ctrl_wait, &wait);
        set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
--->    while (pegasus->flags & ETH_REGS_CHANGED)
                schedule();
        remove_wait_queue(&pegasus->ctrl_wait, &wait);
        set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);

you'll see that if the control URB is being used for asynchronous registers change, we call schedule() until ctrl_callback() clear ETH_REGS_CHANGED.

There is no locking when coming from the other way - pegasus_set_multicast() does not check if there is undergoing control request and stomps away regardless. Since async calls are much faster than the other type and gets called very seldom, it is less likely to
run into collision.  This does not mean the code is safe, though.

What very well may be the actual source of your warning. Easiest way to temporary fix this is to make pegasus_set_multicast() an empty call. I doubt the network layer will be too mad at you, but even if it is you'll at least test this theory.


cheers,
Petko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux