Re: [PATCH v4] xhci - correct comp_mode_recovery_timer on return from hibernate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, March 25, 2013 02:35:37 PM Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Alan,
> 
> Is there a way to disable runtime PM for a PCI host controller, but
> still allow the system to suspend/hibernate?

It should be.  Just write "on" to the controller's power/control file in sysfs.

Thanks,
Rafael


> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 06:33:26PM +0000, Cortes, Alexis wrote:
> > Hi Tony,
> > 
> > Well, considering the circumstances, the only issue I see here is that the system won't be able to wake on a device connect if the port to which the device was connected enters in compliance mode (I might add that compliance mode is not a 100% of the times failure), however I haven't tested this scenario before. 
> > 
> > However I think that this problem doesn't worth to disable suspend/hibernate, but this is my opinion. I wonder if there's a way to re-work this scenario.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Alexis Cortes.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tony Camuso [mailto:tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 11:44 AM
> > To: Cortes, Alexis
> > Cc: Sarah Sharp; Alan Stern; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxx; dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xhci - correct comp_mode_recovery_timer on return from hibernate
> > 
> > On 03/14/2013 05:42 PM, Alexis R. Cortes wrote:
> > > Hi Sarah,
> > >
> > > On 3/11/2013 5:20 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 05:33:26PM +0000, Cortes, Alexis wrote:
> > >>> Hi Sarah,
> > >>>
> > >>> Sorry for my delayed response, I was investigating this. By 'Inactive' state you mean the Compliance mode? since SS.Inactive and Compliance are not the same.
> > >>
> > >> Yes, I mean Compliance mode.
> > >>
> > >>> When in D3hot or D3cold, the host must be able to transmit a PME whenever a device is plugged into the DS port.  If a SS device is plugged into DS port and fails to make it to U0, the Port will land in Compliance or SS.Disabled.  If Compliance, then there will be no PME notification.  If it lands in SS.Disabled, the USB2 will be enabled and then a PME notification will be sent for USB2 connection. I just realized this.
> > >>
> > >> Then we definitely need to poll during runtime suspend, or disable 
> > >> runtime PM for the PCI device all together.
> > >> Does this mean wake from S3 (system suspend) on device connect will 
> > >> be broken as well, if the port fails to make it to U0 and goes into 
> > >> Compliance mode?
> > >
> > > I believe so, since the timing issues caused by the hardware could 
> > > make the port enter to Compliance, thus it will never reach U0. 
> > > However I have never tested this scenario.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Alexis Cortes.
> > >
> > 
> > Alexis,
> > 
> > Does this mean that systems having this chip should not use hibernate/suspend?
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux