On Monday, March 18, 2013 10:09 AM I wrote: > Subject: [PATCH v4 00/46] Towards configfs - usb functions conversion to > the new interface > <snip> > > The prerequisite for providing the configfs interface for USB gadgets and > all their users is converting them to the new function interface from > Sebastian. > > This patch series serves the purpose stated above for mass storage, usb > Ethernet, FunctionFS and serial. <snip> @Felipe, @Sebastian: Converting the above mentioned functions to the new interface has already been a considerable effort, so could you please share your opinion? I understand that Sebastian might not have enough time to do this step of conversion to configfs himself, but with converting the functions to the new function interface I followed his example from e.g. acm. Additional questions: 1. Is converting the functions to the new function interface the right way to go? (given the discussions so far I believe it is, but kindly ask for confirmation or pointing at what to improve) 2. What is the preferred way of finally arriving at a configfs-based gadget: breadth-first approach (convert all functions to the new function interface, then move to configfs) or depth-first approach (convert a function and then move it to configfs, then do the same with some next function and so on) Thanks, Andrzej -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
