On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:17:10PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > 于 2013年03月04日 22:35, Felipe Balbi 写道: > > since stop_activity() also gets called from RESET interrupt, and in that > > case we need to call driver->disconnect(). Can you make a simple test > > that would take current code and issue a device reset to see if that > > would break, then apply my suggestion above and run the same test again? > > after reference the commit: d93e2600d80fc41ccf339b4a2843a3007d479907 > it seems udc_start and udc_stop will have effect, > so not need call driver->disconnect() > > is it correct ? in case of net2272.c and net2280.c, they call stop_activity() also from disconnect and reset interrupt handlers, in that case the gadget driver needs to know about the disconnect. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
