On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:24:58PM +0800, Chao Xie wrote: >> The clock numbers and names are depent of SOCes, > > No they aren't. The clock names used to describe them in your documentation > may vary, but their _purpose_ for the sake of the device will be fixed - > and you should name them appropriately from the _device_ point of view. > > Not the SoC point of view. That way leads to total madness. We've > proven this over the years that we've had the clk API and people have > come up with trash implementations that do that crap. After many > years of struggling, they've seen the light and fixed their shite up > to work the way I originally intended, and... instantly benefited from > it. Yes, you are right, and you explained it very clearly.. I understand what you said. Our SOC document is lack of this kind of inoformation. I will talk with the desgin engneer to make clear it, and make a new version of patches. Thanks for your review and comments. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
