On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 03:45:12PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 04-02-2013 17:24, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> >Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> >diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
> >index b598bb8f..136869b 100644
> >--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
> >+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci13xxx_imx.c
> [...]
> >@@ -147,19 +146,21 @@ static int ci13xxx_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> >+ phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, "fsl,usbphy", 0);
> >+
>
> No need for emoty line here. Keep the style as it was please.
>
> >+ if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>
> Is it valid to call PTR_ERR() on non-error pointer?
Why shouldn't it?
> Isn't it
> better to do this check under *else* clause below the next *if*.
For better readability, yes.
Sascha
>
> >+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >+ goto err_clk;
> >+ }
> >+
>
> This empty line is also not needed, I think.
>
> >+ if (!IS_ERR(phy)) {
> >+ ret = usb_phy_init(phy);
> >+ if (ret) {
> >+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to init phy: %d\n", ret);
> >+ goto err_clk;
> > }
> >+
> >+ data->phy = phy;
> > }
> >
> > /* we only support host now, so enable vbus here */
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
