Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The output of lsusb for interface #1 is the following: > > Interface Descriptor: > bLength 9 > bDescriptorType 4 > bInterfaceNumber 1 > bAlternateSetting 0 > bNumEndpoints 2 > bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class > bInterfaceSubClass 66 > bInterfaceProtocol 1 > iInterface 0 > > It should be an adb device, so probably it is not needed to blacklist > it. Should I resend a new patch with only interface #5 reserved? You could have used USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO() matching on all ff/ff/ff to avoid blacklisting the adb interface, but IMHO the patch is fine as it is. This being an Android device raises another question though: Are these interface numbers static? I assume you can e.g. disable adb? What happens to the descriptors then? Does the device change pid, or are the interfaces renumbered? Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
