On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> I guess it would be good to have a:
>
> enum usb_gadget_state usb_gadget_get_state(struct usb_gadget *gadget)
> {
> return gadget->state;
> }
>
> right ?? At least dwc3 can make use of it.
This seems like unnecessary embellishment. What's wrong with typing
gadget->state
instead of
usb_gadget_get_state(gadget)
? Do you have some reason to think the "state" field will need further
encapsulation in the future?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
