Hi, On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:40:38AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:23:33AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > it's not used anymore by anyone, we can remove it. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > > > > > > > my bad, we still have gadgetfs. > > > > > > I was going to ask you about that :) > > > > > > > In any case, everybody agrees about removing gadgetfs and using f_fs > > > > only ? > > > > > > gadgetfs is a userspace api that I don't think we can just drop all that > > > easily. Does f_fs do everything that gadgetfs does? > > > > yes, just a different name (functionfs instead of gadgetfs). > > No. gadgetfs supports async I/O and f_fs doesn't. we can add that, just copy it over from gadgetfs. No ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
