On 01/16/2013 08:08 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>
>> As Tegra PHY driver needs to access one of the Host registers,
>> added few APIs.
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
>> +void tegra_ehci_set_wakeon_events(struct usb_phy *x, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long val;
>> + struct usb_hcd *hcd = bus_to_hcd(x->otg->host);
>> + void __iomem *base = hcd->regs;
>> + u32 wake = USB_PORTSC1_WKOC | USB_PORTSC1_WKDS | USB_PORTSC1_WKCN;
>> +
>> + val = readl(base + USB_PORTSC1);
>> + if (enable)
>> + val |= wake;
>> + else
>> + val &= ~wake;
>> + writel(val, base + USB_PORTSC1);
>> +}
>
> Here and below, this sort of code is highly questionable. You
> evidently don't realize that some of the bits in the PORTSC registers
> are R/WC. This means writing a 1 to these bits will clear them.
>
> Consequently it is almost always wrong to read a PORTSC register and
> then write back the same (or a slightly modified) value.
Sorry I'm not familiar with USB... Are the bits being manipulated here
(i.e. USB_PORTSC1_WKOC | USB_PORTSC1_WKDS | USB_PORTSC1_WKCN)
standardized USBisms, or some custom Tegra stuff?
Anyway, is the solution here to do:
val = readl(addr)
// i.e. add the following line:
val &= ~(all write-to-clear bits);
if (enable) val |= wake; else val &= ~wake;
writel(val, addr)
... or is there more broken than just that?
Also note that the driver is already doing exactly what is in these new
functions; the code is just being split out so that only the EHCI driver
touches EHCI registers, and the PHY driver only touches PHY registers.
Still, I'll admit it's a good time to fix any mistakes in this part of
the code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
