Re: [PATCH 1/2] usbnet: allow status interrupt URB to always be active

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 12:01 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2013 19:26:33 Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 23:16 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > On Friday 04 January 2013 10:48:16 Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > Some drivers (ex sierra_net) need the status interrupt URB
> > > > active even when the device is closed, because they receive
> > > > custom indications from firmware.  Allow sub-drivers to set
> > > > a flag that submits the status interrupt URB on probe and
> > > > keeps the URB alive over device open/close.  The URB is still
> > > > killed/re-submitted for suspend/resume, as before.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Oliver: alternatively, is there a problem with *always*
> > > > submitting the interrupt URB, and then simply not calling
> > > > the subdriver's .status function when the netdev is
> > > > closed?  That would be a much simpler patch.
> > > 
> > > That is quite radical. We have no idea what a device
> > > does when we do not react to a status update. I would
> > > much prefer to not take the risk.
> > > Besides, we don't use bandwidth if we don't have to.
> > 
> > Ok, so scratch the alternative.  Thus, does the posted patch look like
> > the right course of action?
> 
> In principle yes.
> 
> > If I wasn't clear enough before, sierra_net needs to listen to the
> > status interrupt URB to receive the custom Restart indication as part of
> > the driver's device setup.  Thus for sierra_net at least, tying the
> > status interrupt URB submission to device open/close isn't right.
> 
> So, there seems to be an inevitable race before probe() is called.

Yeah, you're right, we need Sierra to send the SYNC message *after* bind
is called.    Is there an existing "after bind" hook or do we need to
create one?

> Have you looked at FLAG_AVOID_UNLINK_URBS ?

Not yet, but I will.

Thanks,
Dan

> > I'd previously done a patch to handle this all in sierra_net, but the
> > problem there is suspend/resume: without directly accessing the usbnet
> > structure's ->suspend_count member (icky!) sierra_net can't correctly
> > kill/submit the URB itself.  So I went with a flag to usbnet that Sierra
> > can set.
> 
> That is absolutely the right way to do it.
> 
> 	Regards
> 		Oliver
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux