On 12/17/2012 11:21 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote: > Using devm_kzalloc for allocating memory needed for PHY > pointer and hence removing kfree calls to PHY pointer. Since the kfree() here used to be in tegra_usb_phy_close() rather than any remove() function, does it actually make sense to use devm_kzalloc(); would plain using kzalloc() instead, and not removing the kfree() calls, be better? When the PHY code gets converted to be an actual probed driver, then perhaps using devm will make sense. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
