On Tuesday 18 December 2012 14:24:32 Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2012, 14:11 +0100 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 13:10:25 Lucas Stach wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h b/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
> > > index 9bbeabf..8e9516f 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/usb/usbnet.h
> > > @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct driver_info {
> > > */
> > > #define FLAG_MULTI_PACKET 0x2000
> > > #define FLAG_RX_ASSEMBLE 0x4000 /* rx packets may span >1 frames */
> > > +#define FLAG_EEPROM_MAC 0x8000 /* initialize device MAC from eeprom */
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this looks sensible, but
> > why are you adding a flag unused in usbnet to usbnet.h?
>
> Right, this might not be the right place to add this. Could you point me
> to a more appropriate place? The data member of usbnet might be a good
driver_priv is intended for such stuff
> place to stuff this into, but why is this a plain long and not some kind
> of pointer? It is used for a different purpose on other ASIX chips
> already.
But there is another pointer.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
