Hello.
On 03-12-2012 19:58, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 28-11-2012 18:49, Roger Quadros wrote:
Both OMAP4 and 5 exhibit the same revision ID in the REVISION register
but they have different number of ports i.e. 2 and 3 respectively.
So we can't rely on REVISION register for number of ports on OMAP5
and depend on platform data (or device tree) instead.
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
index 87b574b..fda235a 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
@@ -495,19 +495,27 @@ static int __devinit usbhs_omap_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
*/
pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
- switch (omap->usbhs_rev) {
- case OMAP_USBHS_REV1:
- omap->nports = 3;
- break;
- case OMAP_USBHS_REV2:
- omap->nports = 2;
- break;
- default:
- omap->nports = OMAP3_HS_USB_PORTS;
- dev_dbg(dev,
- "USB HOST Rev : 0x%d not recognized, assuming %d ports\n",
- omap->usbhs_rev, omap->nports);
- break;
+ /*
+ * If platform data contains nports then use that
+ * else make out number of ports from USBHS revision
+ */
+ if (pdata->nports) {
+ omap->nports = pdata->nports;
Overindented line?
Sorry, I didn't get it. Did you mean extra tab/space?
Extra tab, yes.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
