Re: [RFC v2] usb/gadget: the start of the configfs interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

> On 11/30/2012 11:07 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:09:38PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >> On 11/30/2012 05:43 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> >>> The iProduct,... names are already defined in the USB spec, and their
> >>> meanings are different from the way you are using them here.  Since
> >>> this will be a user-visible API, we should strive to be compatible with
> >>> the spec.
> >>
> >> I wanted to be close to the USB-specification but since it is not an
> >> integer / number but the actual string I guess it make sense. This
> >> change is part of v3.
> >
> > then how about we drop the hungarian notation altogether ? Instead of
> > sManufacturer we follow the host stack and just call it manufacturer.
> > Likewise for all other fields ??
> >
> 
> that would be manufacturer, product, serial. Fine by me. Anyone?

Okay with me too.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux