On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > The shared code to overwrite the bits should probably print a warning if > > > the host and ACPI bits differ. > > > > I'm not so sure about that. For one thing, who wants warnings to be > > logged every time they run "lsusb -v"? > > Yeah, that's probably not a great idea. > > > Also, this sort of thing might be more common than you might expect. > > I'd guess that if the ACPI information contains anything useful at all, > > it will be different from the [Ex]HCI information. > > > > Tianyu's patches log such warnings for xHCI but not for EHCI. That > > inconsistency is another reason to rework them. > > Tianyu did that because I asked him to for xHCI. I didn't think about > the lsusb implications. You're right that it will probably be annoying > to the user, so he should just drop the warning in the shared code. It could be changed to a dev_dbg. That wouldn't bother people and it might be useful. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
