On Mon, Nov 26 2012, Alan Stern wrote: > In your example, what files would appear under under > /functions/storage? I gather that the "storage" part is just a > placeholder name with no real meaning. The meaning is conveyed > when the user writes "mass_storage" to /functions/storage/name. > > When this happens, would the additional files created in this > directory be those required specifically by the mass_storage function > driver? And nothing else? Specifically by a single instance. > On the other hand, why have two separate directories for > /functions/ttyS0 and /functions/ttyS1? Aren't these two different > instances of the same function? So if the user then writes "acm" to > /functions/ttyS0/name and /functions/ttyS1/name, wouldn't your > framework get an error when it tried to load the acm function module a > second time? This would just create another instance of the same function. This actually gave me an idea. Why not: mkdir functions/acm # the f_acm module is loaded mkdir functions/acm/blah # instance of the function is created -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Attachment:
pgpAr_AXXHi1U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
