On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Jason J. Herne wrote: > I was comparing the two USB captures and I noticed the Windows capture > uses a READ(16) and Linux is using a READ(10). I'm not sure how the > kernel determines which read command to use, but I'm wondering if this > could be the problem here? It could well be the problem. The kernel uses READ(10) if the starting LBA is small enough (<= 0xffffffff); otherwise it uses READ(16). In this case the starting LBA was 0. > I was way wrong about the first read being in the 700's btw :) > Window's first READ(16) is at frame 291. > Linux first READ(1) is at 161. > > Hope this is useful. I'll keep digging. Most likely that's the answer. Of course, for a device to recognize READ(16) but not READ(10) is a violation of the SCSI spec. I don't know what criterion Windows uses. Maybe it uses READ(16) whenever the total capacity is >= 2^32 blocks. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
