Hi, On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 07:23:12PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Balbi, > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:12:36PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > >> This patchset is based on the work by Praveen Paneri for > >> samsung-usbphy driver: > >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12653 > >> > >> Changes from v2: > >> - Using "EXYNOS5_PHY_" as common prefix along with exact names for > >> PHY SFRs for register definitions > >> - Using register names with bit macros to make things more clear. > >> - Removed parentheses around 0x230 in definition for EXYNOS5_USB_CFG > >> in [patch 2/4 v2]. > >> > >> Tested on smdk5250 target with usb-next branch along with arch patches > >> for exynos5250: > >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13042 > >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13048 > >> > >> Vivek Gautam (4): > >> usb: phy: samsung: Add host phy support to samsung-phy driver > >> ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling samsung-usbphy driver > >> USB: ehci-s5p: Add phy driver support > >> USB: ohci-exynos: Add phy driver support > > > > I really don't know what to do with this series. I know it depends on > > the other PHY changes which I have in my queue, but it touches too much > > arch specific code, plus the USB Host code which I don't maintain. > > > > True, that it has dependency on the work by Praveen Paneri for samsung-usbphy > driver plus the arch support patches. > > This is based on usb-next branch, so the host-code can be taken care of ? > > > On top of all that, I have no platform to test these patches, which > > makes me even more worried about signing off under this series ;-) > > > The patches have however been tested. The two patches: > "USB: ehci-s5p: Add phy driver support", > "USB: ohci-exynos: Add phy driver support" have been acked by Jingoo Han > based on the patch-series. > > Possibly Kukjin Kim can help on this one. > > Kukjin, > Can we have a thought on this please. > > > Would it be ok if we delay this to v3.9 ? At least the dependency with > > other PHY changes would be dropped by then. > > > This changes are almost in shape ;-) and i am updating the next patchset soon. > If possible can we try to get this in 3.8 please. :-) we can try, but I'd like to minimize the amount of code outside of drivers/usb/ I take in my tree. If there's any way to split the series so it makes my life easier, I'd be really glad. Also, I can't apply arch/* patches without proper Acked-bys, so Kukjin would need to help us out there too :-) cheers -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
