On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, victor wrote: > Hi, > > In file_storage.c, send_status(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the line > bh->inreq->buf = bh -> buf, > > and in get_next_command(), if (transport_is_bbb()), I add the line > bh->outreq->context = bh, to make the bh address to be the same. > > Is this patch ok? What patch? You didn't post a patch, just a description of some changes. > victor > > -----Original Message----- > From: victor [mailto:victor@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, 31 October, 2012 1:04 PM > To: 'linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' > Subject: Linux USB gadget mass storage > > Hi, > > I am using Linux USB gadget mass storage. I meet with problem in > file_storage.c. The bh->outreq->context in get_next_command() is not equal > to bh. do_set_interface() sets bh->inreq->buf to bh->buf and bh->outreq->context to bh. Does anything ever change these values? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
