On 10/24/2012 11:44 AM, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> We should absolutely avoid Linux-specific properties where possible. >> >> That said, what Linux-specific properties are you talking about? The >> properties discussed here (has-synopsys-hc-bug, no-io-watchdog, has-tt) >> are all purely a description of HW, aren't they. > > "has-tt" is definitely a description of the HW. Can you spell out tt. > "has-synopsys-hc-bug" is too, although determining whether or not it > should apply to a particular controller might be difficult. I'm > inclined not to include it among the properties. What happens when there are 2 synopsys hc bugs? Something more specific about what the bug is would be better. > "no-io-watchdog" is not the greatest name. It describes to controllers > that always do generate IRQs for I/O events when they are supposed to > (and hence the driver doesn't need to set up a watchdog timer to detect > I/O completions that didn't generate an IRQ). So while the concept is > HW-specific, the name refers to a driver implementation issue. A > better name might be something like "reliable-IRQs". Again, it's not > such an easy thing to test for. Almost all the existing drivers leave > it unset. Shouldn't the default be reliable irqs? What about "unreliable-irqs"? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
