On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > This appears to be a bit too heavy handed. First of all, it seems to affect > all memory allocations going in parallel with the resume callback. Second, No, the flag is per task, only memory allocation inside resume callback is effected. > it affects all resume callbacks, not only those where the problem really We can do it only on block device, block device's ancestor and network devices(iSCSI case), but that may introduce policy into PM core or add one flag of memalloc_noio_resume into 'dev_pm_info', could you agree on it? Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
