On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 11:44 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > > > When probed from devicetree, dma_mask is not set but is required by > > the usb subsystem. These patches add a default dma_mask when not > > specified. > > > > Tony Prisk (2): > > usb: Missing dma_mask in uhci-platform.c when probed from device-tree > > usb: Missing dma_mask in ehci-vt8500.c when probed from device-tree > > How about instead of changing ehci-vt8500.c, remove it completely and > use ehci-platform instead? The changes required should be minimal, > especially after ehci_update_device() get moved into ehci-lpm.c and > added to the hc_driver structure for ehci-platform.c. > > Alan Stern The main reason I used ehci-vt8500.c is that it works at the moment, and this was supposed to be a bug-fix. I agree that we should be using -platform, but it currently doesn't have a DT binding, so it's unlikely that I could get a binding formalized and the changes made to fix the current issue for 3.7 Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
