On 09/12/2012 09:49 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote: > Stephen Warren wrote at Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:06 AM: >> On 09/12/2012 04:58 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote: >>> Nvidia produces several Tegra SOCs viz Tegra2, Tegra3 etc. >>> In order to support USB phy drivers on these SOCs, existing >>> phy driver is split into SOC agnostic common USB phy driver and >>> tegra2 specific USB phy driver. >>> This will facilitate easy addition & deletion of phy drivers for >>> Tegra SOCs. >> >> For capitalization/related reasons, I would re-write the commit >> description as: >> >> NVIDIA produces several Tegra SoCs viz Tegra20, Tegra30 etc. >> In order to support USB PHY drivers on these SoCs, existing > > Will change tegra2 to Tegra20 and similar for Tegra30 & NVIDIA. > However as phy is not an acronym, should we still have it in Caps? I'd certainly expect to see PHY in all-caps, yes. As entirely arbitrary justification, see the precedent at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHY_(chip) Sorry for bike-shedding, but I'm picky about that kind of thing, at least sometimes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html