Hi, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Venu Byravarasu wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 3:19 AM > > To: balbi@xxxxxx > > Cc: Venu Byravarasu; ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx; olof@xxxxxxxxx; > > linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: move phy driver from mach-tegra to drivers/usb > > > > On 08/31/2012 12:45 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote: > > > As part of this patch: > > > 1. Moved existing tegra phy driver to drivers/USB directory. > > > 2. Added standard USB phy driver APIs to tegra phy driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Felipe, Would it be possible to apply this patch to a topic branch, so > > that I can merge it into the Tegra tree? The reason is that I'd like to > > remove Tegra's devices.[ch] in kernel 3.7, but to do that, I need to > > move a tiny chunk of code out of that file somewhere else, and doing > > that relies on adding a #include to usb_phy.h/tegra_usb_phy.h, which is > > renamed in this patch. > > > > Alternatively, if you don't think it'll cause any merge conflicts with > > the USB PHY tree, I can just take this patch through the Tegra tree if > > you want. Venu, do you plan any other patches within the next couple > > weeks or so (i.e. before 3.6-rc6) that will depend on this patch? If so, > > taking it only through the Tegra tree might not work so well. > > Thanks Stephen for verifying the changes. > I'm planning to push next patches, with tegra3 phy support added, very soon. Unfortunately the patch didn't apply on my xceiv branch. Could you rebase on top of that ? thanks a lot -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
