Hi, On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 01:39:21PM +0200, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > On Friday, August 31, 2012 12:12 PM Felipe Balbi wrote: > > <snip> > > > Unless it can be proven that ccg has active users, we should get rid of it > > for now before someone starts using it and we need to maintain the ABI for > > the next 10 years. > > We need a configurable composite gadget in the Tizen platform to > provide sdbd connectivity and mass storage function at the same time. You don't need a "configurable composite gadget" if you always have storage and sdbd (btw, what's sdbd ? is that provided by ccg ? I don't think so). A static (temporarily out-of-tree) tizen gadget would suffice, once we move to configfs Tizen can start using that. IMHO, that'll be a much lower impact on Tizen's platform. I'm also concerned that after you start using it and we try to change, it'll just be an argument to keep CCG as is, since it is an interface to userland after all, and I don't want to maintain ccg for the next 10 years as it's clearly wrong approach. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
