On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, megha dey wrote: > I am hitting a dead end at the rpm_resume function as opposed to > rpm_suspend in the commit ID specified.Below is a diff of the > file,wherein I have moved the wake_up_all() location,just above the > failure case (schedule()) and this solves the issue.I would like to > know if this is the right place to apply this change. > Also,can this cause some other issues to crop up? Wait a minute... You said that you are using 3.0.31, not 3.0. The bug I described _is_ present in 3.0.31, and the commit I mentioned should fix it. Even if you can't apply the patch directly, you can make an equivalent change by hand. In rpm_suspend(), move the wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue); line from where it is to just after retval = rpm_callback(callback, dev); Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
