On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:08:45AM +0800, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote: > Hi Felipe, Ajay, Kishon > > In order to add generic USB PHY layer, from my point, below > steps are needed to be done > > 1. Move generic PHY things from otg/ to phy/ > - Split include/linux/usb/otg.h to include/linux/usb/phy.h > and include/linux/usb/otg.h > - Split drivers/usb/otg/otg.c to drivers/usb/otg/otg.c > and drivers/usb/phy/phy.c > - Change CONFIG_USB_OTG_UTILS to CONFIG_USB_PHY_UTILS > - obj-$(CONFIG_USB_OTG) += otg.o > - obj-$(CONFIG_USB_PHY) += phy/ > > 2. Eliminate the relationship between struct usb_otg and struct usb_phy > > 3. Add generic USB PHY layer support to drivers/usb/phy/phy.c > - generic USB PHY layer is implemented at phy.c > - Related driver's change for adopting this PHY layer > > The step 2 is optional, and will take much time. > > Any comments are welcome, I will begin step 1 from next week. Great. We really need the patch :) Thanks Richard > > Best regards, > Peter Chen > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chen Peter-B29397 > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 6:15 PM > > To: 'Gupta, Ajay Kumar'; ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY > > Cc: Balbi, Felipe; psp_usb@xxxxxxxxxxx - Internal USB Discussion/Exchange > > forum (May contain non-TIers); Liu JunJie-B08287 > > Subject: RE: multi-phy generic patch > > > > > > > > As per discussion in list, Felipe was against using "name" > > > so I think we need to find another way. > > > > > > > Below is our latest discussion for this problem. > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg65487.html > > > > both devm_regulator_get and clk_get use "name". If you think it is not > > suitable, > > please suggest. > > > > > > Best regards, > > Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
