On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 15:55 -0400, Forest Bond wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 02:45:10PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 13:25 -0400, Forest Bond wrote: > > > From: Forest Bond <forest.bond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This device is also known as the Verizon USB551L, FWIW. > > Indeed, the one I have is branded this way and I almost mentioned it in the > commit message. Is that good information to include there? Yeah, just put a comment next to the ID or something. > > Of course all the interfaces are 0xff/0xff/0xff except for the CDC ether > > one. Yay. At first I thought maybe one was QMI, which woudl be > > inappropriate for the option driver, but inspecting the Windows drivers > > leads us to these conclusions: > > > > 1) the USB interface numbers are not sequential > > 2) the interface layout is as such: > > > > 0: modem > > 1: DM > > 2: DM (yes, two DM ports) > > 4: GPS > > 6/7: CDC ether (and possibly QMI in the control packets) > > > > so, at some point we should probably try to hook the ether interface up > > to cdc_wdm and see if we get QMI out of this thing. > > I didn't bother looking at the Windows drivers. In any case, it sounds like > this patch is okay with you? Yeah, patch looks good, and with it I can talk to the modem and both DM ports just fine. This was just a comment to let others (Bjorn!) know that we'll *also* probably need some more ids in cdc_wdm. I'm not 100% certain the device does QMI, but I'm 95% sure. Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
