On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:52:57AM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:37:06PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > >> Sometimes, the driver bindings may know what phy they use. > >> For example, when using device tree, the usb controller may have a > >> phandler pointing to usb phy. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> > >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Changes since laster version: > >> - hcd transceiver renamed to phy > > > > Ick, I see patches all over this thread, and other threads, and I have > > no idea what to apply anywhere... > > > > So, consider all chipidea patches dropped from my queue now, can you > > please resend them to me, with the accumulated acks and reviewed-by > > line, so that I can queue them up? > > So will you pick these patches to your tree or should I apply them to > mine or what is the plan? I kind of have a tree [1] for chipidea stuff > where I have been collecting patches, to send a pull request to you for > 3.6. I do not accept pull requests for this code, sorry, I need patches in email. You and Richard work it out how you are going to handle this and then, send me patches that you both agree on. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
