> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:02:43AM +0000, Chen Peter-B29397 wrote: > > > > > > > Can you suggest any other way ? Type is probably not scalable, > that's > > > > > for sure. If you have any other ideas, pleas share them. > > > > > > > > It's not scalable indeed -- ie. on mx28, there're two PHYs which > are > > > basically > > > > the same. Though I have not a real suggestion, sorry. > > > > > > Yeah, on OMAP5 we use the same PHY controller (two instances of it) > for > > > USB3 and SATA signalling. So, what we need, actually, is a kernel- > wide > > > PHY layer. But that'll take time... > > > > > I would like to know why some ways like devm_regulator_get and clk_get > > is not suitable? > > Well, that can be done, but you would need quite some data to associate > phy with usb controller. Can you propose something like that ? Patches > are really welcome ;-) > Ok, I plan to do some RFC USB PHY patches after Kishon and chipidea's patch (For i.mx) are mainlined. > -- > balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
