Re: Callback not called on bulk out transfer with usbfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Austin Schuh wrote:
>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/usb/ehci/0000\:00\:1a.7/async
>> qh/ffff88047452a700 dev8 hs ep2 42002208 40000000 (80008c00  data1 nak4)
>>       ffff880037801180 out len=0 80008c00 urb ffff880596b06600
>
> This means that the transfer was completed but the computer apparently
> never got a completion interrupt.
>
>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/usb/ehci/0000\:00\:1a.7/lpm
>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/usb/ehci/0000\:00\:1a.7/periodic
>> size = 1024
>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/usb/ehci/0000\:00\:1a.7/registers
>> bus pci, device 0000:00:1a.7
>> EHCI Host Controller
>> EHCI 1.00, hcd state 1
>> ownership 00000001
>> SMI sts/enable 0xc0080000
>> structural params 0x00103206
>> capability params 0x00016871
>> status 8008 Async FLR
>> command 0010021 (park)=0 ithresh=1 Async period=1024 RUN
>> intrenable 37 IAA FATAL PCD ERR INT
>> uframe 3f17
>> port:1 status 001000 0  ACK POWER sig=se0
>> port:2 status 001000 0  ACK POWER sig=se0
>> port:3 status 003000 0  ACK POWER OWNER sig=se0
>> port:4 status 001005 0  ACK POWER sig=se0 PE CONNECT
>> port:5 status 001000 0  ACK POWER sig=se0
>> port:6 status 001000 0  ACK POWER sig=se0
>> irq normal 43424 err 0 reclaim 6314 (lost 21)
>> complete 43440 unlink 3819
>
> That's pretty normal, except that the count of lost IAA interrupts
> ought to be 0.

Does that typically mean anything?

> If you get rid of the line saying:
>
>                ehci->need_io_watchdog = 0;
>
> under the PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL case in
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c:ehci_pci_setup(), it may help.

That seems to have fixed it.  Hmm...  I used to be able to run my code
anywhere from 3-30 times before it would hang.  It is at 470 cycles
right now and counting without an issue.

Apart from building and deploying custom patched kernels everywhere
that I need to run my code, is there something that I can do to help
get this hack packaged up into something that could be submitted?  Or,
is there something else that I should look around for that could be
the root cause of the problem?

> This isn't supposed to be necessary; Intel components are pretty
> reliable.
>
> Alan Stern

Thanks for your help!

Austin Schuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux