On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Xu, Andiry <Andiry.Xu@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Try the patch attached. >>> You can modify the timeout to some bigger value (microsecond). >> >> Andiry, thanks for your quick response. >> >> I have asked the guy who reported the problem to test your patch, >> and will post the result once it is done. > > Andiry, thanks. > > The guy has confirmed[1] that your patch does fix the problem, so hope > this one can be merged. Unfortunately, there are timeout failure during resume path, see the log: [ 191.581754] xhci_hcd 0000:05:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 191.584900] xhci_hcd 0000:05:00.0: PCI post-resume error -110! [ 191.584902] xhci_hcd 0000:05:00.0: HC died; cleaning up [ 191.584904] xhci_hcd 0000:05:00.0: HC died; cleaning up [ 191.584909] pm_op(): pci_pm_resume+0x0/0xb0 returns -110 [ 191.584920] PM: Device 0000:05:00.0 failed to resume async: error -110 See[1] for detailed dmesg. [1], https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1002697/comments/62 Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
