Re: [PATCH 4/5] usb: gadget/uvc: Port UVC webcam gadget to use videobuf2 framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:21:13PM +0800, Bhupesh SHARMA wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@xxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:44 PM
> > To: Bhupesh SHARMA
> > Cc: laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > balbi@xxxxxx; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] usb: gadget/uvc: Port UVC webcam gadget to use
> > videobuf2 framework
> > 
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:08:57PM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > > This patch reworks the videobuffer management logic present in the
> > UVC
> > > webcam gadget and ports it to use the "more apt" videobuf2 framework
> > > for video buffer management.
> > >
> > > To support routing video data captured from a real V4L2 video capture
> > > device with a "zero copy" operation on videobuffers (as they pass
> > from
> > > the V4L2 domain to UVC domain via a user-space application), we need
> > > to support USER_PTR IO method at the UVC gadget side.
> > >
> > > So the V4L2 capture device driver can still continue to use MMAO IO
> > > method and now the user-space application can just pass a pointer to
> > > the video buffers being DeQueued from the V4L2 device side while
> > > Queueing them at the UVC gadget end. This ensures that we have a
> > > "zero-copy" design as the videobuffers pass from the V4L2 capture
> > device to the UVC gadget.
> > >
> > > Note that there will still be a need to apply UVC specific payload
> > > headers on top of each UVC payload data, which will still require a
> > > copy operation to be performed in the 'encode' routines of the UVC
> > gadget.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxx>
> > 
> > this patch doesn't apply. Please refresh on top of v3.5-rc1 or my
> > gadget branch which I will update in a while.
> > 
> 
> I rebased and submitted my changes on your "gadget-for-v3.5" tag.
> Should I now refresh my patches on top of your "v3.5-rc1" branch ?
> 
> I am a bit confused on what is the latest gadget branch to be used now.
> Thanks for helping out.

The gadget branch is the branch called gadget on my kernel.org tree. For
some reason this didn't apply. Probably some patches on
drivers/usb/gadget/*uvc* went into v3.5 without my knowledge. Possibly
because I was out for quite a while and asked Greg to help me out during
the merge window.

Anyway, I just pushed gadget with a bunch of new patches and part of
your series.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux