Dear Greg KH,
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:23:46PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > This let usb phy driver has a chance to change hw settings when connect
> > status change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > include/linux/usb/otg.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/usb/otg.h b/include/linux/usb/otg.h
> > index 38ab3f4..385641d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/usb/otg.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/usb/otg.h
> > @@ -117,6 +117,10 @@ struct usb_phy {
> >
> > int (*set_suspend)(struct usb_phy *x,
> >
> > int suspend);
> >
> > + /* notify phy connect status change */
> > + int (*notify_connect_change)(struct usb_phy *x,
> > + int port,
> > + int connected);
> >
> > };
>
> No, please make this two different callbacks. As you see in your code
> when you implemented this, you really have:
> if (connected) {
> do this...
> } else {
> do that...
> }
>
> So you there is no consolidation in the driver, so just make it 2
> callbacks, especially as someone wanted to make connected -1 just for a
> tristate, which would be impossible to document properly...
Or he could make connected an enum maybe ?
>
> greg k-h
>
> > @@ -252,6 +256,15 @@ usb_phy_set_suspend(struct usb_phy *x, int suspend)
> >
> > }
> >
> > static inline int
> >
> > +usb_phy_notify_connect_change(struct usb_phy *x, int port, int
> > connected) +{
> > + if (x->notify_connect_change != NULL)
> > + return x->notify_connect_change(x, port, connected);
> > + else
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int
> >
> > otg_start_srp(struct usb_otg *otg)
> > {
> >
> > if (otg && otg->start_srp)
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
