On Mon, 21 May 2012, Oncaphillis wrote: > On 05/19/2012 08:52 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > > Just that it means leaving interrupts disabled for 250 or 125 us, which > > is not a good idea (but it's not terrible). I'm going to work on > > fixing this properly, but it probably won't get finished until the 3.6 > > kernel release. > > I did some more research on that issue. It fails with 60us and seems to > work when disabling for 70us. This is on one particular machine. I'll > check on a different one too. Ultimately I'm planning to use a 1-ms delay -- but it won't be a call to udelay() and it won't be with interrupts disabled. > I would highly appreciated if I could test further patches and be > informed when they enter main stream kernel development, Certainly. > Thank you You're welcome. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
