On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:49:06AM +0000, Du, ChangbinX wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On 14-05-2012 10:51, Du, ChangbinX wrote:
>
> > As real device-nodes managed by udev whose nodes lived in /dev/bus/usb
> > are mostly used today, let testusb tool use that directory as one
> > default path make tool be more convenient to use.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Du Changbin<changbinx.du@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/usb/testusb.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> > diff --git a/tools/usb/testusb.c b/tools/usb/testusb.c index
> > 6e0f567..c6c839e 100644
> > --- a/tools/usb/testusb.c
> > +++ b/tools/usb/testusb.c
> [...]
> > @@ -376,6 +377,11 @@ static const char *usbfs_dir_find(void)
> > }
> > } while (++it != end);
> >
> > + /* real device-nodes managed by udev */
> > + if (access(udev_usb_path, F_OK) == 0) {
> > + return udev_usb_path;
> > + }
>
> Why {} with single statement?
>
> Hi, thanks for your tip. It's a code style issue. I will remove {}.
>
> By the way, I don't know how I can do with this case? Resend a new
> patch? Do I need include discussion message in new patch mail?
Please resend a new patch with this fixed up.
> And how can I know my patch has be accepted? I am a newbie, could you
> help me?
You will get an automated email from my patch system when it is applied.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
