On 14-05-2012 14:49, Du, ChangbinX wrote:
As real device-nodes managed by udev whose nodes lived in /dev/bus/usb
are mostly used today, let testusb tool use that directory as one
default path make tool be more convenient to use.
Signed-off-by: Du Changbin<changbinx.du@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/usb/testusb.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/usb/testusb.c b/tools/usb/testusb.c index
6e0f567..c6c839e 100644
--- a/tools/usb/testusb.c
+++ b/tools/usb/testusb.c
[...]
@@ -376,6 +377,11 @@ static const char *usbfs_dir_find(void)
}
} while (++it != end);
+ /* real device-nodes managed by udev */
+ if (access(udev_usb_path, F_OK) == 0) {
+ return udev_usb_path;
+ }
Why {} with single statement?
Hi, thanks for your tip. It's a code style issue. I will remove {}.
By the way, I don't know how I can do with this case? Resend a new patch?
Yes, marking that thsi is a new version of patch in the [PATCH] prefix,
like [PATCH v2].
Do I need include discussion message in new patch mail?
Not necessarily, just indicate the change compared to the old version
under the --- tear line.
And how can I know my patch has be accepted? I am a newbie, could you help me?
You will get a reply from the maintainer, Greg Kroah-Hartman, I think.
Changbin
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
